Colonialism

As one of the countries that underwent the longest periods of colonization, the Philippines struggles to be free of colonial influence. The concern for this can be seen in the interviewees’ described futures.

Both the pessimistic and probable scenarios featured global tech giants remaining dominant in the country (as seen in themes like “Problematic Institutions” and “Privatization”), along with misrepresented groups (i.e. “AI-Enabled Automation and Creation). Meanwhile, the optimistic scenario had the theme “Cultural Conservation & Decolonization”, showcasing technologies that conserve and recreate Filipino culture.

In summary, the interviewees wished for a country that can proudly stand on its own, and feared a future where it was consumed by foreign nations.

So how exactly is colonialism manifested? We can first study how the work of great powers directly or indirectly impact the Philippines. According to scholar Michael Kwet, Global North countries like the United States reinstate colonialism in the Global South through the domination of digital technology; powerful institutions like governments and multinationals act out imperialism by controlling the architecture of the digital ecosystem: network connectivity, hardware, and software.

The United States has been already planting infrastructure in the country at these various levels: it set up satellite broadband technology in remote areas, invested money into building tons of semiconductor factories, and collaborated with local mobile phone operators to provide access to data-light services.

While these initiatives claim to empower underserved communities, they also help assert Americans’ dominance over the Philippines’ tech ecosystem. First, satellites give them control over the country’s digital landscape, having the power to decide who gets internet access. Next, workers in new factories are highly likely to experience labor abuses, similar to the migrant workers of Malaysia’s electronics industry. Finally, zero-rated services like Meta’s Free Basics keep users in walled gardens, turning them into passive consumers of local propaganda and Western corporate content.

Controlling digital experiences in the Global South also enables the Global North to enact cultural imperialism. This can be most visibly seen in social media feeds; PhD student Jianna So believes that algorithms on these platforms may prioritize Western content at the expense of Filipino content. The spotlighting of Western trends may pressure Filipinos to follow them, amplifying colonial mentality. Even harmful societal expectations like colorism would be perpetuated; for instance, trending AI photo generators (like yearbook photos) tend to follow Western-centric beauty norms.

In summary, the United States’ control over social media allows it to impose its values and beliefs on the Philippines, making them easier to control.

We can also study the influence of colonialism in the impact of the work Filipinos provide to the rest of the world. As a top country of labor export, Filipinos are a very global population. We are scattered all over the globe, for many of us become Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs) in pursuit of better opportunities abroad. But these opportunities tend to be service jobs, made for serving those in the Global North.

One example of these jobs is care work, as seen in nannies for children and nurses in hospitals.

Another example is the BPO industry, consisting of call center agents and content moderators.

While all of these roles could be considered unglamorous, they keep the places they serve (from cities to platforms) together. An anonymous interviewee describes this well:

The quality of the Philippines is very much still the legacy that has been left on to us by Western colonialism…A lot of [the work we do] is very emotional and very gendered and very...Western-serving work...We're both caring for and exploited by...the Western Empire, and I think that's really how I would describe the Philippines…[Overall,] the Filipino people and our technology is very much inseparable from the rest of the world.

ANONYMOUS INTERVIEWEE

Technologies serve as lifelines for OFWs; messaging apps keep them in touch with loved ones back home, while digital remittances enable them to finally support their families. But at the same time, technologies can also act as instruments of exploitation.

One way this can be done is through dehumanization; for instance, recruitment websites often promote Filipino contractors by highlighting low wages and high English proficiency, treating them as commodities.

Another way this could be done is through neglect; for example, inadequate regulation on social media platforms expose content moderators to traumatizing content.

In general, the ways technology both benefits and harms OFWs reflects colonialism’s legacy in the Philippines.